I came across this interesting paper by Alexander J. Romisowski, dealing with factors leading to success or failure of an educational technology innovation.
In his own words the author focuses on the 'L' for learning rather than the 'E' for electronic. In order for technology to improve learning, it must fit into students' lives, and not the other way round.
Rominowski categorises four major topics related to e-learning, being Learning itself, the Electronic technology, the Needs that justify the project in the first place, and Management issues involved. (E/L/N/M).
He highlights cases where the 'learning' part in an e-learning project is not the primary objective, which is not a favourable idea. This reflects the fact whether the authors come from the information technology, education, management or performance improvement areas.
Technology (electronic) before learning, needs and management.
In such cases authors of such projects have the premise that technology is the answer...what is the question?
People on the information technology side would have these typical guidelines to go about to create a successful project in this field of work:
1. Design the E-Learning product - starting with a powerful learning management system and creating the structure to house content into 3 categories (static pages, multimedia content and hands on labs (quizzes etc)
2. Build the content and delivery infrastructure (consisting of filling in the three structures with content you have created earlier)
3. Create student services and administrative support (system troubleshooting, password management etc)
4. .... sell the system
Following such steps is a clear case where emphasis is being put on technology rather than on the learning. This also comes before the establishment of a need... a case of putting the cart before the horse. Here we are selecting the technology, then the content and then giving attention to the practicalities of actually making it work. This is an entrepreneurial approach, and quite risky as well, where we first create the product and then try to create a market for it.
Further posts related to e-learning failures shall be found in this thread.
Did you feel compelled to adopt an e-learning solution in your institute by looking at the technological side rather than the needs that have to be satisfied and the effective learning that would take place?
My opinion about the ICT institute is that although moodle has been adopted, it is being used as a repository of data aiding the educators and students to organise themselves via a central storage of notes, rather than a tool to aid collaboration and effective learning. The technology has satisfied the need for effective organisation of course material, but did not satisfy the need of providing a healthy collaborative environment for student difficulties and research, as these needs have been initially disregarded.
The full text of this paper is found in the following link: